OpenFOAM Windows Timing Comparisons
Submitted by symscape on March 26, 2008 - 10:37.
Here are results of an execution time (as reported by OpenFOAM) comparison between OpenFOAM running on the same dual boot computer.
Computer specifications were:
Wine is a Windows emulator that runs under Linux.
Computer specifications were:
- 2.6GHz Pentium 4 with Hyper Threading
- 32 bit
- 1GB RAM
Windows XP Pro SP2 | Linux (Ubuntu 7.10) | Wine (v0.9.46) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
High Priority | Normal Priority | |||
Time | 65.708 s | 68.942 s | 50.8 s | 67.3 s |
% of Linux | 129% | 136% | 100% | 132% |
Log File | windows-high | window-normal | linux | wine |
Another Timing Comparison
Submitted by symscape on March 27, 2008 - 14:58.
Another timing comparison (suggested by Henry Weller) for a much larger 3D case using the same machine as previous.
The case was the Xoodles pitzDaily3D OpenFOAM tutorial, with the following modifications:
The case was the Xoodles pitzDaily3D OpenFOAM tutorial, with the following modifications:
- on the internal cells and walls k was initialized to 2e-10 to avoid divide by zero
- limited to first 20 timesteps
- for Windows the file 0/b was renamed to 0/b_ to avoid conflict with the file 0/B (this is why the patch was updated)
Windows XP Pro SP2 | Linux (Ubuntu 7.10) | Wine (v0.9.46) | |
---|---|---|---|
Time | 739.906 s | 524.84 s | 702.27 s |
% of Linux | 141% | 100% | 134% |
Log File | windows | linux | wine |
출처:http://www.symscape.com/openfoam-on-windows#comment-129
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기